After more than a year talking about it, there finally is a common interface for clock-implementations available.

And no: It’s not (yet) PSR-20.

Especially in combination with constructor property promotion.

Recently I did a code-review on an entity from a PHP8.0 project. What I saw was this:

The origin

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

namespace App\Entity;

use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;

#[ORM\Entity]
#[ORM\Table(name: 'user')]
class User
{
    #[ORM\Id]
    #[ORM\Column(type: 'integer', unique: true)]
    public int $id;

    #[ORM\Column(type: 'string')]
    public string $username;

    #[ORM\Column(type: 'string')]
    public string $passwordhash;

    public function __construct(
        int $id,
        string $username,
        string $passwordhash,
    ) {
        $this->id = $id;
        $this->username = $username;
        $this->passwordhash = $passwordhash;
    }
}

I was thinking about using constructor property promotion to get rid of the property declaration and property assignment but immediately thought that that would require us to handle the attributes differently. So I shortly checked my favourite search engine and realized that indeed we are able to shorten this whole stuff considerably:

The result

<?php


declare(strict_types=1);

namespace App\Entity;

use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM;

#[ORM\Entity]
#[ORM\Table(name: 'user')]
class User
{
    public function __construct(
        #[ORM\Id]
        #[ORM\Column(type: 'integer', unique: true)]
        public int $id,
        #[ORM\Column(type: 'string')]
        public string $username,
        #[ORM\Column(type: 'string')]
        public string $passwordhash,
    ) {}
}

Combining the attributes with the constructor property promotion allows much smaller entity definitions.

Immutability

In our case we also cleared a misunderstanding. My colleague was under the impression that Doctrine requires properties to be public. Otherwise they are not able to be hydrated properly. That is not the case and Doctrine can perfectly hydrate private properties!

So we decided to go for private properties in combination with getters. As in our concrete implementation we actually also need to execute some logic before returning some of the values. So declaring the properties private and having getters provides us with a truly immutable entity.

As we are not using PHP8.1 yet we could not make use of the new readonly declaration which would have solved the issue with the immutability though as we need logic in some cases the approach with using getters always makes more sense in this particular setup.

Yesterday the RFC regarding Deprecating Dynamic Properties went into voting phase and it currently looks like the overwhelming majority supports the RFC.

But nevertheless the discussions yesterday started in the wider PHP community whether that is a good idea or not.

To summarize the RFC in very short terms: Currently PHP allows to assign values to a class property that was not previously declared. The RFC proposes to remove this implicit feature in PHP9. It will still be available as an explicit feature when the creator of the class adds an Annotation [AllowDynamicProperties] on the class level.

To prepare for that, in the next minor version of PHP – PHP 8.2 – whenever one assigns a value to an undeclared property there will be a deprecation notice raised.

So the proposal is – in essence – about moving from implicitness to explicitness. Which is in my opinion a very good move.

So what is the discussion that I was talking about previously all about? After all that sounds like a good move, doesn’t it?